Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
22317 e1 xl k t41a fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Synonym: 0190207590000 22317 E1 K T41A 22317EKJA VA405 Befestigungshlse: AHX2317 Auendurchmesser: 180 mm Freiraumueres Breitenmae: B a min 6 mm Minimale fr Hlse Bezugsdrehzahl: 3. 200 1 min ueres Breitenma: 60 mm Gewicht: 7000 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 4. 100 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmiernutueres Breitenma: 9,5 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Synonym: 0190207590000 22317-E1-K-T41A 22317EKJA/VA405 |
| Befestigungshülse: AHX2317 |
| Außendurchmesser: 180 mm |
| FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaße: B a min 6 mm Minimale für Hülse |
| Bezugsdrehzahl: 3.200 1/min |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 60 mm |
| Gewicht: 7000 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 4.100 1/min |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 9,5 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 180,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "4100.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 60,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 60,00 |
| E1 Increased Capacity Design |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 7 |
| Innenmaße: mm 85,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C4 Innenluft (größer als C3) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 540000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 560000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "3200.0000" |
| T41A Spherical Roller Bearings For Vibrating Screens (C4 Clearance), Old Designation is C4.F80 |
| XL X-Life |
| AHX2317 Befestigungshülse |
| B 60 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 200 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 560.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 540.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 51.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 180 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Durchmesser Schmierkanal: 4,8 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 540.000 N |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,04 |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 3,04 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 51.000 N |
| Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y: 0,33 |
| Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter: 104 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2,5 mm |
| Minimale FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaß für Hülse: 6 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 99 mm |
| Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse: 94 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 3 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 560.000 N |
| Statischer Axiallastfaktor: 2 |
| T max 200 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Y 0 2 Statischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 1 2,04 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 2 3,04 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| d =a max 104 mm Maximaler Durchmesser der Wellenschulter |
| d =a min 99 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =b min 94 mm Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse |
| d =s 4,8 mm Durchmesser Schmierkanal |
| e 0,33 Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y |
| n G 4.100 1/min Grenzdrehzahl |
| n s 9,5 mm SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| n ϑr 3.200 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl |
| r a max 2,5 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 3 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 7,085 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 607 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Protection with days of white residue
Style: SPF 50 Roll On, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Mineral sunscreens have yet to master blending in and this is no different. If you're thinking of hitting the beach with your sexy bum protected it'd better be a ghost beach because you'll look like you've been dipped in white paint. Oh, and it doesn't wash off, so be prepared to look like Casper for days to come.
It rolls on fine if you shake it well first and it does protect.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great product
I really like this sunscreen!
It feels lightweight, absorbs quickly, and doesn’t leave my skin feeling greasy. The SPF 55 gives great protection, and it works well for everyday use. Great value for the price!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Delivers what it promises
I’m a fair skinned person who burns and freckles easily and in my 40’s. I also love being outside. I have worn spf on my face (and usually my hands) basically every day since I was 13 and because of that people always say I don’t look my age. Back then, only a 4 or 8 was available in face moisturizers, but I have always worn the highest that is recommended and usually face moisturizers are behind in meeting the recommendations so I have usually worn a full on sunscreen under my makeup. As the recommendations get higher it has been harder to find something that doesn’t look pasty, smell bad or interfere with makeup. I was using Eucerin spf 30 and Cera Ve spf 30 but I have wanted to increase spf to 50 because that is what is recommended now. I tried the Cera Ve spf 50 and was disappointed by how tacky it is and pasty it looks. I don’t even like wearing it alone to the beach because it’s so chalky white and sticky. Neutrogena healthy defense is alright but it has a scent and some chemicals that are not so good. It also is a pretty small bottle (1.7 oz) when you use it everyday on face and hands.
But THIS product has blown me away with its affordability and quality. It IS sheer. Easily blends in and disappears quickly into skin. It’s completely odorless. It’s not tacky or greasy—you feel moisturized but not sticky. It performs under foundation even better than the Cera Ve 30. Now, this doesn’t have the extra ceramides and vitamins that does so I’ll still be using that when I feel extra dry like in winter, or I might mix the two moisturizers, but this Solimo reef safe sunscreen will definitely be my daily face and hand sunscreen in the spring, summer and early fall. These are the days I go straight from work to the garden or the beach. I can quickly reapply over my makeup before I leave the house again feel fully protected while I’m out.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2022
★★★★★ 4
I believe equal to name brand rhyming with NitroGina
I believe it is equal to the name brand mentioned on the front side of the tube. It is 55 SPF Sun Protection Factor so it offers strong UV A and UV B protection which are the 2 ranges of sun rays that do the skin damage and burning.
It is an easily absorbed lotion that when rubbed goes into the skin and is not visible.
It feels good after being rubbed in in that it feels dry and not overly greasy or with no shine and sheen.
If you put on a shirt over your skin with lotion it will appear on the inside of a dark shirt but it will wash out right away when that shirt is washed.
It is a good product and offers burn protection to me in some clear-sky strong sun uses. Reapply after entering the pool or after an hour (all sunscreen labels say reapply after 80 minutes which I believe is per recommendations of the federal FDA or some medical studies).
I reapply often and I still get tanned but I do not want to burn.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Super impressed by this!
Love this sunscreen and will be reordering it. It’s sheer, light, invisible, gives me the protection I need for my middle aged skin and I can swear my complexion has gotten better since I started using it. I’m super impressed how it’s comparable to more expensive brands in quality without the high price tag. It’s made me start looking into other skin products I can purchase from the Amazon brand.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026